Virgin Birth, the Color of Fossil Snakes, and More Recent Updates

As I did in March, I wanted to highlight some recent and exciting updates to some of my older articles.

Snakes That Give Virgin Birth

Phylogenetic pattern of parthenogenesis in snakes Molecular tree on left, morphological tree on right From Booth & Schuett 2016

When I wrote about asexual reproduction in snakes in February 2014, new records of this phenomenon were rapidly accumulating, from snakes as distantly related as cottonmouths and boa constrictors. In a new paper, Warren Booth and Gordon Schuett review the knowns and unknowns of "virgin birth" in snakes, a subject which has become their specialty (it even has its own Facebook group). Although obligate parthenogenesis is still known only from Brahminy Blindsnakes (Indotyphlops braminus), the new summary reports that facultative parthenogenesis has now been documented in 20 species of alethinophidian¹ snakes, and this list is anticipated to grow, although so far confirmed cases are limited to five lineages: boids, pythonids, Acrochordus, Crotalinae, and Natricinae. This new synthesis formalizes one of the trends that I wrote about in 2014, namely distinguishing between "Type A" facultative parthenogenesis, in which the offspring produced are large clutches of viable females that seem to have a strange "WW" sex chromosome arrangement (apparently typical of boas and pythons), and "Type B" facultative parthenogenesis, which is where all the offspring are male and few are born alive, many with extreme developmental abnormalities (apparently typical of colubroids).

Most intriguing is the hypothesis laid out for explaining this dichotomy: that boas and pythons (and possibly other basal alethinophidian snakes) might have an XY sex determination system rather than a ZW one like most snakes. Changes from ZW to XY or vice versa (and between genetic and temperature-dependent sex determination) have been documented in geckos and turtles, and could have been overlooked in boas and pythons due to their similar-looking sex chromosomes (tests are currently underway to falsify or verify this hypothesis). If true, this would explain the production of all-female offspring by facultative parthenogenesis; instead of WW, those females would be XX, just like humans!
Identifying Snake Sheds

True-color representation of the fossil snake (MNCN 66503) in McNamara et al. 2016. The dentition looks too solenoglyphous for a colubrid, although the 10-million year old specimen, which is missing its head, has not and probably can not be identified to species.

Ever since the first reports of color from the skin and feathers of dinosaur fossils were published in Science in 2010, I've been fascinated by the ability of paleontologists to see in color when they look into the past. A new paper in the journal Current Biology reveals the color of a fossil snake, determined from using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to examine microfossils of certain types of skin cells, called chromatophores. So far, only melanin-based chromatophores (melanosomes, which are responsible for brown and black color) have been detected in fossilized skin and feathers, probably because they are the most resistant to the decomposition process. But, this study was also able to detect and measure other types of chromatophores from fossilized skin, including xanthophores (responsible for yellow, orange, or red color, derived from carotenoids or pteridines) and iridophores (responsible for iridescence). By comparing the fossil's chromatophore abundance and position to that of living reptiles, they were able to reconstruct the original color and pattern of the fossil snake's skin. For example, in the skin of living snakes, xanthophores with many more pteridine granules than carotenoid granules produce a red hue, whereas xanthophores with equal amounts of carotenoid granules and pteridine granules—as in the fossil—produce yellowish hues. Skin regions with abundant iridophores and xanthophores, but relatively few melanophores, are associated with green hues in some living skinks, whereas skin regions with many melanophores, a few xanthophores, and no iridophores suggest correspond to dark brown or black tones. As you can see in the depiction, this snake seems to have had a pale, creamy venter and a green back and sides, with areas of brown/black and yellow/green, perhaps not unlike modern Green Watersnakes (Nerodia floridana) or Boomslangs (Dispholidus typus).

Photo and diagram of courtship behavior of Chrysopelea paradisi Taken at the Sepilok Jungle Resort in Sabah, Malaysia Female shown in gray, males in blue, green, and orange From Kaiser et al. 2016

A new report on the mating behavior of Paradise Flying Snakes (Chrysopelea paradisi) showed that their courtship can involve multiple males. Although several experiments have been performed on the gliding behavior of these snakes, almost nothing is known about their natural history in the wild. Males of many species of snakes court females en masse by rubbing their chins along their bodies, a behavior which allows them to sense her sex pheromones and jockey for position. The role played by the female in choosing a male is unclear in most snake species; although conventional biological wisdom suggests that females should be the choosy sex, male-male competition seems to dominate courtship behavior in several species of snakes. Multi-male courtship behavior precedes mating in some well-studied temperate snakes (e.g., gartersnakes emerging from hibernation), as well as in some tropical species (e.g., anacondas, some other southeast Asian colubrids, such as Boiga irregularis and Dryophiops rubescens). Of course, it seems that most female snakes can store sperm for long periods of time, and they may have some control over which male's sperm to use to fertilize their eggs, so the genetic contribution of a female snake's male partners may not follow from their courtship or mating success. Unlike the terrestrial or aquatic mating balls documented for other snakes, the flyingsnakes in this observation were able to move as a unit for almost 50 feet through complex habitat—under a porch, up a tree—an adaptation that seems to fit their active, arboreal lifestyle and might help reduce the likelihood of a predatory attack during what must otherwise be a vulnerable time.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Thanks to Gordon Schuett for clearing up some of the details of his recent paper.

REFERENCES